top of page
Search

OCD and the Architecture of Psychopathology

  • Writer: John-Michael Kuczynski
    John-Michael Kuczynski
  • Apr 13
  • 3 min read

Some mental disorders are chaotic. Others are precise. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is very much in the second camp. Its rituals are meticulous. Its obsessions are weirdly specific. Its internal logic—though alien to the outsider—often follows rules that the sufferer can articulate with uncanny clarity.

That’s what makes OCD such an ideal window into the deeper question:

Why do some people, with all the apparent ingredients for disorder, remain mentally intact—while others develop full-blown pathology?

We all repress. We all have violent fantasies. We all harbor unspoken taboos. And yet only a small subset of people experience intrusive thoughts about stabbing their loved ones—or need to wash their hands 27 times to feel “safe.” What’s different?

Let’s explore.

🧠 OCD Is Not Just “Too Much Anxiety”

The pop psychology view treats OCD as an exaggerated version of normal anxiety. But that doesn’t explain much.

Plenty of people are:

  • Cautious

  • Perfectionistic

  • Hyper-responsible

…without ever developing compulsions or obsessions. OCD is not just more of the same. It’s qualitatively different—a specific, reproducible pattern of thoughts and behaviors that is oddly uniform across individuals and cultures.

This tells us something critical:

  • OCD isn’t just a spectrum endpoint

  • It’s a discrete cognitive protocol

In other words: a mental app that only some people have installed—or that only activates under certain conditions.

🔐 Freud Was (Mostly) Right

Say what you will about Freud, but his core account of OCD still hits hard:

  • Repressed rage and sadism

  • A punitive superego that blocks healthy expression of those drives

  • Result: a kind of psychic gridlock resolved through ritual and obsession

This framework is still descriptively accurate. But it raises the same question Freud couldn't answer:

Why do some people, with these exact ingredients, not develop OCD?

🧬 OCD as an Evolutionary Protocol

To understand why OCD is so specific, we have to stop seeing it as a glitch and start seeing it as a misfiring system—one with evolutionary roots.

OCD almost always revolves around a handful of core themes:

  • Contamination

  • Harm prevention

  • Forbidden sexual or violent thoughts

  • Blasphemy or taboo violation

  • Symmetry, order, and counting

These are not arbitrary. They map onto evolutionary priorities:

  • Avoiding disease

  • Protecting kin

  • Preserving group cohesion

  • Respecting moral boundaries

  • Navigating symbolic systems (e.g., ritual, language, number)

The mind wasn’t designed to be "normal." It was designed to solve ancestral problems. And the same modules that helped our ancestors survive—vigilance, self-monitoring, moral internalization—can overfire, especially under modern conditions.

OCD, in this view, is a maladaptive overactivation of otherwise useful mental routines.

🎚️ Why Don’t More People Have It?

If OCD depends on repressed rage + anxiety + guilt + taboo—all of which are common—then why doesn’t everyone get it?

Here are the main suspects:

1. Neurobiological Wiring

Research shows:

  • Overactive error detection (anterior cingulate cortex)

  • Dysfunctional habit loops (basal ganglia)

  • Dysregulated serotonin and glutamate systems

This suggests a hardware vulnerability that makes certain brains more prone to looping thoughts and compulsive rituals.

2. Cognitive Style

OCD-prone individuals tend to:

  • Think literally

  • Struggle with ambiguity

  • Be highly self-surveilling

This makes their minds unusually fertile ground for black-and-white moral logic and catastrophic "what ifs."

3. Developmental Timing

The same trauma that a 10-year-old might metabolize can hit a 4-year-old like a brainquake. If certain neural circuits are active at the wrong moment, a self-reinforcing pattern might lock in early.

🏙️ Is OCD a Modern Condition?

No—but it has modern variants. Modernity:

  • Bombards us with information overload

  • Weakens ritual frameworks that once channeled compulsions into socially acceptable practices

  • Raises the stakes of moral performance (branding, purity, visibility)

OCD is ancient. But in today’s world, it mutates:

  • Fear of contamination becomes fear of toxic thoughts

  • Ritual becomes private penitence

  • Moral anxiety becomes existential self-policing

We no longer confess to priests. We confess to ourselves, over and over again.

⚠️ Final Thought: The Rogue Priest

In a pre-modern world, the person with OCD might have been a religious specialist, a moral sentinel, a keeper of ritual purity. But in the secular, rationalist world, that energy has nowhere to go. It loops. It spirals. It torments.

OCD, then, is not chaos. It’s over-structured order, turned inward and weaponized against the self.

The rituals aren’t pointless. They’re displaced meaning. Echoes of protocols that once made us human—but now have nowhere left to run.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Why Dictators Wear Tunics

In democratic societies, politicians must perform relatability. Their clothing becomes a kind of soft theater: a red tie here, a...

 
 
 
Husserl=Schizophrenic Drivel

Edmund Husserl, founder of phenomenology and patron saint of the Continental tradition, remains a revered figure among certain academic...

 
 
 
Numbers as Ordered Pairs

by John-Michael Kuczynski Abstract: According to Frege, n=Kn, where n is any cardinal number and Kn is the class of all n-tuples....

 
 
 

Comentarios


bottom of page